Legal Opinion
United States v. Perry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 1970No. 22872PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit J udge:
The Anti-Kickback Act prohibits “any fee, commission, or compensation of any kind or the granting of any gift or gratuity of any kind, either directly or indirectly,” by a subcontractor to any officer, partner, employee, or agent either of a prime contractor holding a negotiated contract with the United States or of a higher tier subcontractor under such a prime contract, when such payments are made “as an inducement for the award of a subcontract or order from the prime contractor or any subcontract- or, as an acknowledgment of a subcontract or order…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Shiosaki v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Betty Sankovich v. The Life Insurance Company of North America and Credit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Joseph P. Londrigan v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Richard W. Neely v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.