Legal Opinion

Wightman v. Hall

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1923No. Civ. No. 4048PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This is an action for specific performance of a written contract giving plaintiff an option to purchase property held by the defendants as equal co-owners in common. The contract was dated September 5, 1919, and expired January 15, 1920. On the last-mentioned date Della M. Hall signed her name, followed by the word “agent," executing a writing purporting to extend the plaintiff’s option to February 15, 1920. On February 14th plaintiff tendered to Della M. Hall the agreed purchase price. She rejected this offer. The contract was executed by each of the defendants, but Della M. Hall was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Vassault v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Olson v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Construction Products Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Pearce v. Third Ave. Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Cicinelli v. IwasakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Simons v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API