Legal Opinion
Huckaby v. Northam
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 3, 1924No. Civ. No. 2662PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
Plaintiff sued in ejectment to recover possession of certain mining ground alleged to be included in an unpatented claim known as the “Durable.” The answer denied the allegations of the complaint. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the restitution of the premises. Judgment was entered accordingly and the defendants moved for a new trial on the ground, among others, of “insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict.” On the 3d of July, 1918, the court made an order granting the motion, without specifying the ground upon which the same was granted. This appeal is from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Stock v. PlunkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Rice Lands & Products Co. v. BlevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Lutz v. Merchants Nat. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Cramer v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- De La Falaise v. Gaumont-British Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Harvey v. MacHtigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Malloway v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Denman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.