Legal Opinion

Carriage Way Apartments v. Pojman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 27, 1988No. 2—88—0085, 2—88—0155 consPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Inglis

This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307(aXl) taken from a preliminary injunction entered against plaintiffs. We reverse.

On appeal, plaintiffs contend (1) that the trial court’s summary award of a mandatory injunction was tantamount to a prejudgment attachment and violated due process; (2) that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the lack of an adequate monetary remedy at law; (3) that the trial court abused its discretion in summarily granting a preliminary mandatory injunction without proper pleading or proof, and without bond; (4) that the trial court was divested of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LogstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. K. F. K. Corp. v. American Continental Homes, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Butler v. PalmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  4. Schlicksup Drug Co., Inc. v. SchlicksupAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. American Re-Insurance Co. v. MGIC Investment Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Franz v. Calaco Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. City of Stamford v. KovacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Ron Smith Trucking, Inc. v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Russell v. HoweAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Bowman v. Dixon Theatre Renovation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API