Legal Opinion

W. G. Reddingius Co. v. Enkema

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1923No. 23,349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Action to recover money had and received for plaintiff’s use and benefit. A jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor and defendant has appealed from an order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment or a new trial.

For a number of years prior to 1914 defendant and W. O. Red-dingius had been copartners in the real estate business. In 1914 they incorporated the Enkema-Reddingius Company (now the W. G-. Reddingius Company) and it took over the business of the copart-nership. Defendant was president of the corporation, his wife vice president, Reddingius secretary and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Miller v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Person v. McCargarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Independent School District v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Geist v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API