W. G. Reddingius Co. v. Enkema
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Action to recover money had and received for plaintiff’s use and benefit. A jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor and defendant has appealed from an order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment or a new trial.
For a number of years prior to 1914 defendant and W. O. Red-dingius had been copartners in the real estate business. In 1914 they incorporated the Enkema-Reddingius Company (now the W. G-. Reddingius Company) and it took over the business of the copart-nership. Defendant was president of the corporation, his wife vice president, Reddingius secretary and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Miller v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Person v. McCargarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Independent School District v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Geist v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930