Legal Opinion

Person v. McCargar

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1904No. Nos. 13,869—(132)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Otter Tail county, Baxter, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $182.72.

1Opinion of the Court

START; C. J.

Action to recover the stipulated wages for work performed as a farm laborer by the plaintiff for the defendant. The complaint alleged that the term of service was eight months; also the stipulated wages per month, and that no part thereof had been paid. The answer admitted the allegations of the complaint, except that it alleged that the term of service ended in the fall when it froze up. The difference between the parties as to the amount earned was only some $8. The answer, *295as a defense, alleged that the plaintiff did not perform his implied contract with the defendant to serve…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. MayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weed v. Idaho Copper Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. W. G. Reddingius Co. v. EnkemaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API