Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1998No. 1-96-2641PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Following a jury trial, defendant Don Harris was found guilty of aggravated criminal sexual assault, criminal sexual assault, armed violence and aggravated kidnapping. Defendant now contends his convictions should be reversed and a new trial granted because: (1) the trial court erred in failing to quash the arrest and suppress evidence; (2) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of other crimes; (3) the prosecutor improperly commented on his failure to testify; (4) the trial court erred in allowing evidence and argument as to the complainant’s alleged loss of virginity; (5) he was denied…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. IllgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. FoskeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. LuczakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. State v. PughSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. ChildressAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. JoinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. People v. DeenadayaluAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API