Legal Opinion

People v. Luczak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 1999No. 1-97-2763PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Mara Frossard

Defendant, Theodore Luczak, appeals his conviction for two counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce in its case in chief evidence that defendant sexually assaulted a different victim six years prior to the current charges.

Prior to trial, the State moved to introduce into evidence defendant’s prior crime, arguing that evidence of the other crime showed defendant’s intent at the time of the charged crime and established defendant’s modus operandi. Over objection, the trial court granted the motion and stated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. IllgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. McDonaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. KimbroughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. RathSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. ChildressAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. DeenadayaluAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API