Legal Opinion
State v. Kinney
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1998No. Nos. 97-1175 and 97-1176PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
The appellate court certified the following issue to this court: “whether [a] search warrant is invalid, as to [a] provision authorizing search of ‘all persons’ that were at [a] residence during execution of [the] search warrant, as it did not name or particularly describe any person or place.” For the reasons stated below, we find that the search warrant was valid.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CastagnolaOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BoyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.