Legal Opinion

State v. Castagnola

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2015No. 2013-0781PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

{¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from the Ninth District Court of Appeals, we consider whether a search-warrant affiant’s undisclosed evidentiary inference stated as an empirical fact usurped the inference-drawing authority of the magistrate who issued the warrant in reliance on the affidavit. We also consider the application of the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment to the search of a computer. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the search warrant at issue in this case was invalid and that the evidence obtained in executing the warrant must be suppressed. We…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. EOG Resources, Inc. v. Lucky Land Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  3. State v. Dibble (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. LaRosa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. NeilOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API