State v. Moore
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
The appellate court certified the following issue for our review and resolution: “Is the odor of burnt marijuana, alone, sufficient to provide probable cause to search a defendant’s motor vehicle?” We answer the certified question in the affirmative and hold that the smell of marijuana, alone, by a person qualified to recognize the odor, is sufficient to establish probable cause to search a motor vehicle, pursuant to the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. There need be no other tangible evidence to justify a 'warrantless search of a vehicle.
Sergeant Greene conducted a search…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by248 opinions
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GardenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.