Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2000No. Nos. 99-1855 and 99-1960PublishedCited by 248 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

The appellate court certified the following issue for our review and resolution: “Is the odor of burnt marijuana, alone, sufficient to provide probable cause to search a defendant’s motor vehicle?” We answer the certified question in the affirmative and hold that the smell of marijuana, alone, by a person qualified to recognize the odor, is sufficient to establish probable cause to search a motor vehicle, pursuant to the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. There need be no other tangible evidence to justify a 'warrantless search of a vehicle.

Sergeant Greene conducted a search…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by248 opinions

  1. State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. GardenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

243 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API