Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2000No. 1999-1855 & 1999-1960PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 47.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MOORE, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Moore,

2000-Ohio-10.] Criminal law—Search and seizure—Drugs—Smell of marijuana, alone, by a person qualified to recognize the odor, is sufficient to establish probable cause to conduct a search. The smell of marijuana, alone, by a person qualified to recognize the odor, is sufficient to establish probable cause to conduct a search. (Nos. 99-1855 and 99-1960—Submitted May 23, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Robey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. Buckner, 21892 (8-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. McClellanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. White, Unpublished Decision (6-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API