State Ex Rel. Fetters v. Hott
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEELY, Justice.
This case comes before us on a rule to show cause in prohibition under the criteria of Hinkle v. Black, 164 W.Va. 112, 262 S.E.2d 744 (1979). The relator claims that his trial and conviction in the Circuit Court of Mineral County was in violation of the Agreement on Detainers, W.Va.Code 62-14-1 [1971]. Essentially, relator argues that it was improper to try him in West Virginia once he had been returned to Maryland. The State replies that the return was an “informal transfer” and, therefore, not covered by the statutory language. As this issue presents us with a matter of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Smith v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hinkle v. BlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Luis E. Chico and Gail A. ColelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Ben Hitchcock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Banker v. BankerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Daniel D.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Ewing v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Francis O. Day Co. v. Director, Division of Environmental ProtectionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.