Legal Opinion
Berger v. Nazametz
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided July 27, 2001No. 3:00-cv-00584PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HERNDON, District Judge.
I. Introduction
David Berger filed suit in this Court against the Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee Plan (“RIGP”) and Patricia Nazametz, as the administrators of an employee benefit plan under ERISA. Berger seeks equitable relief, including restitution, for the Plan’s alleged violation of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code and for the alleged implementation of treasury regulations. Berger terminated his employment before a normal retirement age pursuant to a Voluntary Reduction in Force program. Berger alleges that the lump sum…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Santaella and Cary Eldridge v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Samsung America, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, Samsung Shipbuilding & Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Formerly Known as Samsung Shipbuilding and Heavy Industries Company, Limited, a Republic of Korea Corporation, Samsung America, Incorporated, and Samsung Construction Equipment Company, a Division of Samsung America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Arthur Oates v. Discovery Zone, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Berger v. Xerox Retirement Income Guaranty PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2002
- Laurent v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Deppenbrook v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013