Legal Opinion
Berger v. Xerox Retirement Income Guaranty Plan
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided September 30, 2002No. 00-00584-DRHPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HERNDON, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On July 27, 2001, the Court entered partial summary judgment against the Xerox Retirement Income Guaranty Plan (“RIGP” or “the Plan”), holding that the RIGP violated ERISA (Doc. 126). Berger v. Nazametz, 157 F.Supp.2d 998 (S.D.Ill.2001), citing Esden v. Bank of Boston, 229 F.3d 154 (2d Cir.2000); Lyons v. Ga.-Pacific Corp., 221 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir.2000); I.R.S. Notice 96-8, 1996-1 C.B. 359-61, 1996 WL 17901. The Court directed Plaintiffs to submit to the Court a report indicating the amount of additional benefits owed to the Class…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cima v. Wellpoint Health Networks, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2008
- Thompson v. Retirement Plan for Employees of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Frommert v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Harrisonville Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Wilson Ex Rel. Adams v. Cahokia School District 187District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.