Legal Opinion
Deppenbrook v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 17, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0600PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The pro se plaintiffs, a group of former employees of a now defunct steel product producer, Republic Technologies International, LLC (“Republic”), seek review under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2012), of agency determinations made by the defendant, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”), pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1002-1461 (2012). See generally Second Amended Complaint (“Compl.”). Currently before the Court are the parties’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deppenbrook ex rel. RTI Beaver Falls Employees v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Paul Deppenbrook v. PBGCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Royal Oak Enterprises, LLC v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015