Legal Opinion
Sandstone Resources, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 8, 1992No. 91-1206PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY.
BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge:
Under the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, producers may not sell various categories of gas at more than the maximum prices established by the Act. Sandstone Resources, Inc., petitions for review of an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission determining that costs incurred in removing liquid brine brought to the surface with natural gas are “production costs,” as defined in the Commission’s regulations, and therefore not separately recoverable from the purchasers of the gas. Because the agency’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mullins Coal Co. of Va. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Boston & Maine Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Entex, a Division of Arkla, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc., Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Intervenor. Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc., Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Intervenor. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, and the United States of America v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc. And the State of Montana, Department of Commerce, Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. And the State of Montana, Department of Commerce v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Entex, a Division of Arkla, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993