Legal Opinion

Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Entex, a Division of Arkla, Inc., Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 9, 1993No. 92-1002PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge:

Laclede Gas Company petitions for review of an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approving a contested settlement of the remedy phase of an enforcement proceeding against the United Gas Pipe Line Company. Under the settlement, United would refund $19 million to its natural gas customers to compensate them for amounts they were overcharged from 1972 through 1986. We conclude that, although the Commission employed the proper legal standard in evaluating…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. Koch Gateway Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Wisconsin Public Power Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. Port of Seattle v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API