Legal Opinion
Laclede Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Entex, a Division of Arkla, Inc., Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 9, 1993No. 92-1002Published
1Opinion of the Court
997 F.2d 936
302 U.S.App.D.C. 246, Util. L. Rep. P 13,955
LACLEDE GAS COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
Entex, a Division of Arkla, Inc., et al., Intervenors.
No. 92-1002.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Jan. 26, 1993.
Decided July 9, 1993.
Kenneth J. Neises, Washington, DC, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on [302 U.S.App.D.C. 248] the brief was Jennifer N. Waters, Washington, DC.
Katherine Waldbauer, Atty., Federal Energy Regulatory Com'n ("FERC"), Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.