Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 9, 1993No. Nos. 88-1114, 88-1257, 89-1149, 89-1192, 91-1255 and 91-1360PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS.

STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

Montana wheat and barley farmers ship their grain via Burlington Northern to ports in the Pacific Northwest for transportation to markets in the Pacific Rim. The Interstate Commerce Commission, in a decision not contested here, has found Burlington to have “market dominance” over these shipments; as a result, the Commission has jurisdiction over the rates. See 49 U.S.C. §§ 10701a(b)(l) and 10709(b) (1988). In the set of decisions under review the Commission awarded the shippers over $16…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cross-Sound Ferry Services, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, and Viking Starship, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  2. Central of Georgia Railroad Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  3. United States Clay Producers Traffic Ass'n v. Central of Georgia RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Sandstone Resources, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc., Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Intervenor. Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc., Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Intervenor. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, and the United States of America v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, McCarty Farms, Inc. And the State of Montana, Department of Commerce, Intervenors. McCarty Farms, Inc. And the State of Montana, Department of Commerce v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API