Legal Opinion

State v. Skenandore

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 3, 2000No. 22730-4-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

Neil Skenandore appeals his jury conviction for second degree assault, arguing that the evidence of a deadly weapon was insufficient and that double jeopardy barred the prosecution because the prison had already disciplined him for the same act. He raises additional issues in a pro se brief, including prosecutorial delay in filing the information, violation of chapter 9.98 RCW (governing disposition of a pending information against a prison inmate), lack of jurisdiction, disregard of his application for a writ of prohibition, and ineffective assistance of counsel. Agreeing that the evidence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Daniel J. Garrity v. Patrick FiedlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BarraganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. BarraganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. In Re MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State of Washington v. Policarpo Cruz-NavaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API