Legal Opinion

State v. Barragan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 3, 2000No. 18220-7-IIIPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

9 P.3d 942 (2000)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Miguel Angel BARRAGAN, Appellant.

No. 18220-7-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Two.

October 3, 2000.

Paul J. Wasson, Spokane, for Appellant.

Stephen P. Scott, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Ephrata, for Respondent.

SCHULTHEIS, J.

Miguel Barragan was convicted of first degree assault for stabbing a fellow inmate with a pencil. On appeal he contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior assaults and in giving the jury an instruction defining "deadly weapon." He also argues he had ineffective assistance of counsel.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. MagersWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API