Legal Opinion

State v. Cole

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1995No. 62316-3PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*266Talmadge, J.

— Petitioners Michael E. Cole and James Szymanowski were both convicted for drug-related offenses. Prior to their convictions, each was subjected to a civil forfeiture action that resulted in the forfeiture of certain personal property. Cole and Szymanowski now seek vacation of their convictions and sentences claiming their criminal convictions violated the double jeopardy clauses of the United States Constitution and of the Constitution of the State of Washington. U.S. Const. amend 5; Wash. Const. art. I, § 9. Cole also seeks reversal of the trial court’s denial of his motion to…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. TheinWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. VickersWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In re the Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 2002

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API