Legal Opinion

Daniel J. Garrity v. Patrick Fiedler

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 2, 1994No. 94-2450PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Daniel J. Garrity filed a writ of habeas corpus alleging that his conviction for solicitation of burglary following the imposition of prison discipline for the same conduct violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. The district court denied his writ and this appeal followed. We affirm.

I

Daniel Garrity was incarcerated at the Green Bay Correctional Institution when, on June 14, 1990, prison officials caught him passing a note, which discussed plans for several burglaries, to a visitor. Prison authorities filed a conduct report against Garrity, accusing him of violating…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Michael Meeks v. Daniel R. McBride and Attorney General of the State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. STATE EX REL. FRANKLIN v. McBrideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. United States v. Reggie Neon BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API