Legal Opinion

State v. Gocken

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1995No. 61482-2; 61603-5PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

The question before the court is whether the double jeopardy clause of the Washington State Constitution, article I, section 9, extends broader individual rights to a criminal defendant than the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution, amendment V. We hold it does not.

Background

State v. Gocken

On October 28, 1990, at approximately 2 a.m., Mr. Frederick L. Gocken placed a license plate on a vehicle parked at the Shamrock Car Wash in the city of Spokane. He also handed what appeared to be cash to an unidentified person. Several people observed this transaction and reported their…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API