Legal Opinion

Clendening v. London Assurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1960PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Felts

This is a suit for workmen’s compensation. Plaintiff alleged that R. D. Trammel was engaged in the business of building houses and contracted with Jones, Cantrell & Jones to do the brick work; that they employed plaintiff to help lay the brick, and while doing this, the scaffold on which he was working collapsed, he fell, and sustained injuries; and that Trammel was the “principal contractor” and his insurer, the defendant, was liable, under section 15 of the Act. T.C.A. sec. 50-915.

Defendant in its answer admitted that Trammel was engaged in building houses, operating under the Work*606men’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Odom v. Sanford & TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Vester Gas Range & Mfg. Co. v. LeonardTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Brady v. ReedTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stratton v. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Baxter v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Para v. Richards Group of Washington Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Cromwell General Contractor, Inc. v. LytleTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Murray v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API