Legal Opinion

Finley v. Keisling

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This is a suit by Mrs. Finley, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Pub. Acts 1919, chapter 123), to recover for the death of her husband, upon allegations that he died from injuries received while in the employ of the defendants, a partnership.

On April 30, 1923, the defendants purchased a boundary of timber from Hilery Carr, and erected a sawmill upon the land for the purpose of manufacturing the timber into, lumber.

On January 30, 1924, the defendants entered into a written contract with C. L. Swafford to cut the timber on said land and deliver same to its mill.

Subsequently, Swafford…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Indiana Iron Co. v. CrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CheathamTennessee Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Odom v. Sanford & TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Frost v. Blue Ridge Timber Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  5. Seals v. ZolloTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API