Legal Opinion
Corliss v. O'Brien
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 20, 2006No. 05-4799UnpublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In February 2005, Justin M. Corliss, a prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint. Corliss claims that the defendants fraudulently misrepresented facts in appeals of various civil actions he filed in state court. He contends that defendants O’Brien, Vican, and Lavelle retaliated against him for attempting to redress his grievances “by penning opinions that have no basis in law or fact ...” causing dismissal of his suits and denial of access to the courts. Corliss also alleges that the defendants conspired to deprive him of his constitutionally protected rights by “ignoring] facts…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mrs. Carmella M. Borelli v. City of ReadingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by161 opinions
- ABRAMS v. TERRADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ACEVEDO v. REICHLEYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ALLEN-MURPHY v. MURPHYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ANDERSON v. TERRADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- ARREY v. ZEBLEYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.