Legal Opinion
MDB Communications, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 2007No. Civil Action 05-2131 (PLF), 06-0604(PLF)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
There are several pending motions in these consolidated cases. In Civil Action No. 05-2131 (“Case 1”), there are pending cross motions for summary judgment, as well as a motion to amend the complaint. In Civil Action No. 06-0604 (“Case 2”), there is a pending motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. 1 For the reasons explained below, the Court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the claims in the Complaint in Case 1, denies plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the claims in the Complaint in Case 1, denies…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Washington Post Company v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- MDB Communications, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Beck v. Test Masters Educational Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.