Legal Opinion

MDB Communications, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 24, 2008No. Civil Action 05-2131 (PLF), 06-0604 (PLF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

In these consolidated cases, the Court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the claims arising from Civil Ac tion No. 05-2131 (“Case 1”) in an Opinion and accompanying Order on March 28, 2007. See MDB Communications v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., 479 F.Supp.2d 136 (D.D.C.2007) (“Opinion”). In sum, the Court held that because plaintiff was in breach of a provision of its insurance policy requiring it to submit information requested by the insurance company, plaintiff could not bring suit under the policy. See Opinion, 479 F.Supp.2d at 144-45.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. CONTINENTAL TRANSFERT TECHNIQUE LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA Et Al., DefendantsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. CONTINENTAL TRANSFERT TECHNIQUE LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA, Et Al., DefendantsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Duma v. Unum ProvidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Duma v. Unum ProvidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. In re Black Farmers Discrimination LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API