Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Systems, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 10, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2005-2502PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Sandra Marshall (“Marshall”) seeks monetary relief for alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2012) and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985 (2012). Marshall alleges that defendants, Honeywell Technology Systems, Inc., L-3 Communications Government Services Inc., 1 and SGT Inc. (individually, “Honeywell,” “L-3,” and “SGT” or collectively “defendants”), wrongfully terminated her employment on the basis of discrimination and retaliation for filing an internal Title…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Washington Post Company v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sandra Marshall v. Honeywell Technology SystemsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Brown v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Sandra Marshall v. Honeywell Technology SystemsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Sandra Marshall v. Honeywell Technology SystemsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016