Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Crist
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to foreclose a lien claimed for street work done in the city of Oakland by appellant under the so-called Vrooman Act.
A demurrer was interposed to the amended complaint on two grounds: 1. For insufficiency of facts, and, 2. That several causes of action have been improperly united in this: That causes of action to foreclose liens against twelve separate and distinct parcels of land have been improperly united.
The demurrer was sustained and judgment passed for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from this judgment.
In paragraph V of the amended complaint it is alleged that, on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Haughawout v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Schwiesau v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Himmelmann v. SpanagelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- McCaleb v. DreyfusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Realty Construction & Mortgage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Powers v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Hansen v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hansen v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928