Legal Opinion

Udell v. McFadyen

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBebnaed S. Meyeb, J.

This action involves two properties in the Village of Lake Success. As stipulated by the parties, the court has viewed the properties and the environs. The north-south artery of the village is Lakeville Road. Generally, the northern boundary of the village is a substantial distance south of Northern Boulevard, but for several hundred feet on either side of Lakeville Road it juts northward and reaches Northern Boulevard. Initially the neck of land thus described was zoned Business “ A ” for a distance of 400 feet south of Northern Boulevard and Business “B” for the remainder of the distance to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Town of Somers v. CamarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Molnar v. George B. Henne & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Udell v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Town of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Blumberg v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Levine v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Daum v. MeadeNew York Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API