Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Town of East Hampton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*552OPINION OF THE COURT
LAZER, J. P.
In this action, Curtiss-Wright Corporation seeks judgment declaring the unconstitutionality as applied to its property of two zoning amendments enacted by the Town Board of the Town of East Hampton which successively raised the minimum building lot requirement in the Montauk area from one-half acre to two acres. Following trial, Special Term rendered judgment declaring the current zoning classification valid, reasonable, constitutional and consonant with the town’s comprehensive plan and not confiscatory. The appeals are from that judgment and from a further…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Village of Chestnut Ridge v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Blitz v. Town of New CastleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Taylor v. Incorporated Village of Head of HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Tilles Investment Co v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.