Legal Opinion

Daum v. Meade

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel Gr. Albert, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of a residentially improved parcel of real property, a portion of which lies within the unincorporated area of the defendant Town of North Hempstead and abuts property, lying completely within that unincorporated area, owned by the defendant Malman.

The latter property, approximately 163 acres, constitutes the most southerly portion of a larger tract commonly known as the Port Washington “ sand pits

In this action, plaintiff seeks a judgment declaring the invalidity of certain amendments to the building zone ordinance and map of the defendant town which purported,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Walus v. MillingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Linn v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Place v. HackNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dur-Bar Realty Co. v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Herrington v. Town of MexicoNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API