Legal Opinion

Medsker v. Pogue

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1891No. 74PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.

The appellant was the plaintiff below. He alleges in his complaint that the appellee undertook to cause a stallion, of which he was the owner and keeper, to serve a mare belonging to appellant, and in so doing, by his negligence and carelessness, caused the mare to receive an injury of which she died.

A demurrer to the complaint being overruled, and exception taken, a general denial was filed to the complaint.

The cause was tried by a jury, and verdict returned for the appellee.

A motion for a new trial was then made by the appellant, which was overruled, and exception taken. Judgment was given…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Manning v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. ChampionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Chicago & Erie Railway Co. v. CummingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Morrison v. KendallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. DeVay v. DunlapIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Morningstar v. MusserIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API