Manning v. Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Southern District of New York. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.
The. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, on tbe second day of December, 1868, employed Manning and one Hall as its general agents for New York and other States, to secure applications for life insurance, and to collect and pay over premiums on insurances effected. It was stipulated that tbe agreement should continue in force three years from Sept. 1,1867, and that it might thereafter be terminated by either party on giving six months’ notice. By the contract, the compensation allowed to Hall and Manning was twenty per cent on the ordinary premiums…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
3Cited by73 opinions
- Stevens v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Ohio Building Safety Vault Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. . RazeziczNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.