Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Kendall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1893No. 706PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Erom the Laporte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellant was the plaintiff, and the appellee Edward H. Learning was the defendant in the court below. The action was on a promissory note, executed hy the defendant and one David Kendall, by the name and style of Kendall & Learning. It was dated at Laporte, Indiana, on November 13,1863, due in twelve months after date, payable-to the order of one Ezekiel Morrison. It was indorsed by said Morrison in blank. , It appears hy the averments of the complaint that David Kendall was dead at the time the suit was instituted. No reason is given for including his name in the complaint. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Davis v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Birke v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Josselyn v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Messick v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Sponhaur v. MalloyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Cox v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bierhaus v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Runkle v. PullinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API