Ingalls v. Monte Cristo Oil & Development Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff was awarded judgment in damages for. personal injuries., Defendant appealed from the said judgment more than sixty days after entry thereof and its counsel frankly admit that they may not question the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. However, they insist that the judgment should be reversed for one or more of the following reasons:
1. The complaint does not state a cause of action.
2. The trial court gave erroneous and misleading instructions.
3. The court erred in overruling defendant’s objections to certain questions asked of witnesses Tooker and Senter.
There was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Dow v. City of OrovilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Waller v. TJD, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Newman v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Grossetti v. SweaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Dunn v. DufficyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.