Legal Opinion
Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Hawaiian Triathlon Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 4, 1990No. 89 Civ. 8211 (JES)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Timex Corporation's (“Timex”) motion to intervene as a party defendant in the above-captioned action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 24. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The facts relevant to the disposition of this motion are undisputed. In 1970, Marvel registered and has since used the mark “IRON MAN” in connection with the publication of comic books and related merchandise licensing activities. Meanwhile, Hawaiian Triathlon Corporation (“Hawaiian”) has organized and conducted a well-known…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States Postal Service v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Ionian Shipping Company, and Allied Chemical Corporation, Intervenor-Appellant v. British Law Insurance Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Michael Meeropol and Robert Meeropol v. Louis Nizer and Doubleday & Co., Inc., and Fawcett Publications, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Jersey City v. Consolidated Rail CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance SocietyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004
- Building and Realty Institute of Westchester and Putnam Counties, Inc. v. State Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Van Hollen v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Van Hollen v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013