Legal Opinion

Van Hollen v. Federal Election Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-0766Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) CHRISTOPHER VAN HOLLEN, Jr., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0766 (ABJ) ) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Intervenor-defendant Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) has moved for leave to amend and supplement its answer so that it can bring three cross-claims against defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) to be heard if the regulation challenged in this action is invalidated. CFIF Mot. and Mem. for Leave to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Roeder v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  3. Vinson v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Schneider v. Dumbarton Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  5. National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API