Van Hollen v. Federal Election Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Intervenor-defendant Center for Individual Freedom (“CFIF”) has moved for leave to amend and supplement its answer so that it can bring three cross-claims against defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) to be heard if the regulation challenged in this action is invalidated. CFIF Mot. and Mem. for Leave to File Am. and Supp. Ans. and Cross-Claims [Dkt. # 81]. Both plaintiff Van Hollen and defendant FEC have opposed the motion. PL’s Mem. in Opp. to CFIF Mot. [Dkt. #86]; Def. FEC Opp. to CFIF Mot. [Dkt. # 88],
The Court granted CFIF’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roeder v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Vinson v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Schneider v. Dumbarton Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.