Milwaukee Mechanics Insurance Co. v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
The plaintiffs’ demurrers, which were overruled and to which judgment exceptions pendente lite were filed, enumerated certain paragraphs of the defendants’ answers and set forth certain reasons why all of the enumerated paragraphs should be stricken. Those paragraphs of the answers which were demurred to were in effect allegations of the defendants’ affirmative defenses, and though the plaintiffs enumerated the paragraphs to be stricken, their demurrers were nothing more than general demurrers to, or general motions to strike, the defendants’' affirmative defenses. The answers are not subject…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- German American Mutual Life Ass'n v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Thompson v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Smaha v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Gellis v. B. L. I. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Beardsley v. Suburban Coach Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951