Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Wilkins
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
The sole question raised by this bill of exceptions is: Does the plaintiff’s petition, as twice amended, state a justiciable controversy authorizing the granting of a declaratory judgment?
As stated in a leading opinion: “The difference between an abstract question and a 'controversy’ contemplated by the Declaratory Judgment Act is necessarily one of degree, and it would be difficult, if it would be possible, to fashion a precise’ test for determining in every case whether there is such a controversy. Basically, the question in each case is whether the facts alleged, under all the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Brown v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Mensinger v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Georgia Marble Company v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- ALEA London Limited v. WoodcockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Hatcher v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Vandiver v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1963
- PENN. THRESHERMEN &C. INS. CO. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.