Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Wilkins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1962No. 39457PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

The sole question raised by this bill of exceptions is: Does the plaintiff’s petition, as twice amended, state a justiciable controversy authorizing the granting of a declaratory judgment?

As stated in a leading opinion: “The difference between an abstract question and a 'controversy’ contemplated by the Declaratory Judgment Act is necessarily one of degree, and it would be difficult, if it would be possible, to fashion a precise’ test for determining in every case whether there is such a controversy. Basically, the question in each case is whether the facts alleged, under all the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Brown v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Mensinger v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Georgia Marble Company v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. ALEA London Limited v. WoodcockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Hatcher v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Vandiver v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1963
  5. PENN. THRESHERMEN &C. INS. CO. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API