Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 8, 1952No. 13849PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

The appellee agrees that, with one omission, the appellants’ statement of the case is correct. Accordingly, that concise and accurate statement (but without its record references) is here quoted:

“The Appellee (plaintiff in the Court below) brought suit against Appellants to recover expenses and attorney’s fees claimed to have been sustained because of Appellants ‘failure to live up to’ a certain automobile liability insurance contract existing between the parties.
“The case was tried before the Judge without a jury principally upon an agreed stipulation of facts * * * the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. New York Life Insurance v. BabcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. SammonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Standard Accident Ins. Co. of Detroit v. HullDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
  5. Carter v. Virginia Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Cohen v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. Inhabitants of TopshamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Security Mutual Casualty Company v. LuthiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API