Smaha v. George
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
An instrument, reciting a consideration of $10 and other good and valuable considerations, purporting to convey lands to the maker’s nephews and nieces, with the usual habendum and warranty clauses and provisions of a deed, purporting to be signed by the maker by “his x mark,” attested by two witnesses, one a notary public, delivered to one of the grantees at the time of its execution, and recorded during the life of the grantor, is a deed, and not a void will because improperly witnessed as such, where, after conveying the property to the grantees, their heirs and assigns,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ray v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- State v. . ParishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Millen & Southwestern Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Teague v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.