Diblik v. Marcy
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Martin Diblik sued Scott Marey after Marcy sold him a house with a defective underground septic tank. Before closing, Marcy signed a statutory disclosure statement in which he stated that, "to the best of [his] knowledge," there were no defects in the septic system. Marcy also signed an "addendum" in which he incorrectly answered "none" when he was asked to "list all repairs done in the last two years." Following a bench trial, the superior court entered judgment for Marey. Diblik argues that the court erred, because Marey is Hable for his misstatements…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Schlesinger v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Bevins v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Seybert v. Cominco Alaska ExplorationAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Daggett v. FeeneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Whitney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Purcella v. Olive Kathryn Purcella TrustAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.