Legal Opinion
Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 18, 2013No. 2012-3119PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Marie C. Conforto seeks review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s dismissal of her appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Although she sought review in this court, Ms. Conforto now challenges this court’s jurisdiction to hear her appeal in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kloeckner v. Solis, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 596, 184 L.Ed.2d 433 (2012). For the reasons explained below, we conclude that we have jurisdiction over this appeal, and we affirm the Board’s decision.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kloeckner v. SolisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Elias Covington v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Garcia v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Margaret J. Schultz v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- 55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1675, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,952 Julio M. Cruz v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Abbey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Troy v. Samson Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Brookens v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Perry v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.