Legal Opinion

City of Toledo v. Toledo Edison Co.

Lucas County Court of Common Pleas

Decided September 19, 2000No. CI 99-1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Ann Lanzinger, Judge.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} This is a declaratory judgment action brought by the city of Toledo to determine its rights and the consequences if a Special Improvement District (“SID”) is authorized to provide electricity to city residents. The complaint contains two counts.1 The first asks whether an agreement entered into January 28, 1997, with the Toledo Edison Company will be affected if the city creates a *134SID to provide electrical service. The second count asks whether “stranded costs” would have to be paid and, if so, how much.

{¶ 2} Defendant Edison has filed a Civ.R.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Bush v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Southgate Development Corp. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API