Kohli v. Public Utilities Commission

The issue before this court is whether the commission acted against the manifest weight of the evidence: For the reasons set forth below we decline to adopt appellants’ position and are compelled to affirm the commission.

R.C. 4905.22 states in pertinent part that, “[e]very public utility shall furnish necessary and adequate service and facilities, and every public *14utility shall furnish and provide with respect to its business such instrumentalities and facilities, as are adequate and in all respects just and reasonable. * * *” It is this language that appellants would have us construe to…